Friday, May 13, 2011

Rethinking the Limits to Miniaturization


In an earlier blog post I wrote:
"Did you know 4.0" ends with a few predictions: 2020, should bring us primary access to the internet through smartphones and computers with computing power of a cell phone that could fit in a blood cell.  I am not so sure that these predictions will come true.  Something that we have not yet imagined may be the primary means of accessing the internet at the end of this decade; there may be a limitation to miniaturization, only time will tell.

I had doubts about the ability to squeeze the computing
power of a smartphone into a blood cell. Well… perhaps I
am wrong about the limits to miniaturization. I found a
recent article  discussing what is actually being done 
presently along the lines of miniaturization quite astonishing:
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2381185,00.asp
 
The article “Be Careful Not to Inhale the World’s Smallest
Computer”,  Evan Dashevysky describes an extremely small
computer that has been designed by a team at the University
of Michigan's College of Engineering for use in medicine. 
Measuring in at around one cubic millimeter, it is a prototype
measuring device that would be implanted  in human eyeballs 
in order to take pressure readings related to glaucoma. Quoting 
the article  “…the system houses  an ultra low-power 
microprocessor, a pressure sensor, memory, a thin-film battery,
a solar cell, and a wireless radio with an antenna that can
transmit data to an external reader placed near the eye…”
 
This is beginning to sound like the “Did You Know 4.0” people
 are on to something. The device has a sophisticated  energy 
saving /conservation mode, where it only uses  energy on the 
order of nanowatts. It can take and save readings that it takes
 every fifteen minutes for a week and can be charged by
 10 hours of inside light or 1.5 hours of sunlight.   
Work is being done to help it communicate with other devices. 
 
Once communication with other devices become practical, 
I can see many of these nearly microscopic devices or 
their components being combined to make smaller
devices that are functional at the same level of smartphones
of today and actually going beyond them in functionality.   
No, we maynot have smartphone level computing power in
any devices the size of a blood cell yet, but I can see devices 
on the dimensional level of  a few cubic millimeters,  that 
can communicate with each other and be combined to create 
devices that are even thinner, lighter and more powerful than
the ipad. 
 
If miniaturization while increasing power and ability is 
possible, following Bells and Moore’s laws, we may soon be
on our way to things no one has yet imagined. (As described
 by Evan Dashevesky in this article...” Bell's Law of Computer
 Classes illustrates the process by which computers steadily  
evolve into ever  smaller and more efficient models. The law,
which works in correlation with Moore's Law  of exponentially
escalating processing muscle, describes how whole new
 classes of computers arise roughly once a decade…”
 
We may come to the point where a laptop, notebook or 
netbook computer even workstations  become ultra thin 
devices the size of a few coins-that are hooked up
to an ultrathin foldable or “roll-up-able” keyboards 
and screens, that could fit in a wallet or pocket. I also feel 
that privacy,  data protection and ethics will become even 
greater concerns. If a device the size of a cubic  millimeter can 
be placed on a car for instance or on a persons’ body or 
clothing without their knowledge, they could be tracked. While
there may  be some legitimate uses, such as parents being 
able to track teen-agers for instance or for skiers and hikers
to voluntarily make use of small devices that could 
communicate widely and used very little energy, in case they
were to get lost or stranded,  but I see much potential for abuse 
as power saving and miniaturization advances are made. 

1 comment:

  1. Why do all of these posts have the same date of publication (my yucky brother's birthday)? I'm just asking.

    ReplyDelete